Press Freedom Advocates Slam Paramount for Caving to Trump in $16M Settlement

The parent company of CBS News, Paramount Global, announced Tuesday that it has agreed to pay U.S. President Donald Trump $16 million to settle what legal experts called an entirely meritless lawsuit over the media organization’s handling of a pre-election “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris.

Under the reported terms of the settlement, the money will go toward Trump’s legal fees and his future presidential library. Paramount said the settlement deal does not include a formal apology, but the company agreed to release written transcripts of future “60 Minutes” interviews with presidential candidates.

Critics responded with outrage to news of the settlement, which one observer characterized as “spineless capitulation to extortion.” Some posted screenshots to social media showing they canceled their Paramount+ subscriptions in response.

As Paramount engaged in talks with Trump’s legal team over the lawsuit in recent weeks, press freedom advocates and members of Congress implored the organization not to settle, warning that caving to the president would reward and embolden his attacks on media outlets he views as his political enemies.

“If you settle cases, you’re going to send a message to your news team to not push the envelope for fear of people being sued,” media attorney Edward Klaris told The Washington Post, “and you’re going to court more cases against your company because they might think that if they sue you they’re going to collect.”

Paramount’s controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, supported a settlement with Trump in the hope that it would “clear the way” for federal approval of the company’s merger with the entertainment company Skydance, according to The Wall Street Journal, which cited sources familiar with the internal discussions. Bloomberg reported that Redstone could reap $180 million in “severance and other benefits on top of hundreds of millions from the sale of her stock” if the merger goes through.

In May, the Freedom of the Press Foundation — a Paramount shareholder — cautioned that a settlement with Trump “could amount to a bribe” to the Trump administration in exchange for approval of the merger. The advocacy group said it would sue Paramount if the company caved to the president, arguing that “a settlement of Trump’s meritless lawsuit may well be a thinly veiled effort to launder bribes through the court system.”

Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) similarly warned Paramount that a settlement with Trump could run afoul of federal anti-bribery laws.

“Paramount appears to be attempting to appease the administration in order to secure merger approval,” the senators wrote in a May 19 letter to Redstone.

Clayton Weimers, executive director of Reporters Without Borders USA, said in a statement Wednesday that the settlement was “a shameful decision by Paramount.”

“Shari Redstone and Paramount’s board should have stood by CBS journalists and the integrity of press freedom,” said Weimers. “Instead, they chose to reward Donald Trump for his petty legal assault against both. A line is being drawn between the owners of American news media who are willing to stand up for press freedom and those who capitulate to the demands of the president.”

“Paramount’s leaders chose to be on the wrong side of that dividing line, but they’d be mistaken to believe appeasing Trump today will stop his attacks in the future,” Weimers added. “News media owners are much better off standing strong than acquiescing.”

This story has been updated to include a statement from Reporters Without Borders USA.